"Angels can fly because they take themselves lightly." – G. K. Chesterton

I’d imagine that this is not a terribly common choice is this category.  During my sophomore year of college, I took “The British Novel I”.  Pamela was the second book we read.  My copy was four pages long, and they were large pages, and the print was small.  At first I was quite distressed to see that apparently the entire thing was going to be about a young and innocent maid struggling to resist the advances of a rich guy.

Then, oddly enough, I started to appreciate the book.  It is long.  It is repetitive.  One part consists of the narrator simply listing all of the things that she had written previously, which is simply the events of the book up to that point.  But all of it serves a point.  It is an in-depth character study, where everybody, major and minor, gets a chance to be developed.  Richardson’s moral values are not twenty-first century values, but in this work he accomplishes what every author should strive to accomplish.  He takes us inside a person’s viewpoint and allows us to explore that person with depth and subtlety.

Comments on: "Day 9: A book you thought you wouldn’t like but ended up loving" (2)

  1. Terpsichore said:

    Wait. Do you mean that your copy was four *hundred* pages long? Otherwise it might be a British short story, really.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: